Thursday, June 30, 2022
Bill King Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Bill
  • Policy Discussion
  • Categories
  • Tune in
  • Home
  • About Bill
  • Policy Discussion
  • Categories
  • Tune in
No Result
View All Result
Bill King Blog
No Result
View All Result
Home City Of Houston Finances

City and County Should Approve Purchase of Land to Protect Elm Grove

by Bill King
December 8, 2020
in City Of Houston Finances, Flooding, Harris County, Kingwood, Rebuild Houston, Rebuild Houston - Drainage Fee
0
City and County Should Approve Purchase of Land to Protect Elm Grove
Share this article
  
54
Shares

Many of you will recall the heartbreaking flooding in the Elm Grove subdivision in Kingwood twice in the span of five months last year.  Although part of the subdivision was built in the 100-year flood plain, it had never flooded previously.  Many blamed the flooding on the work done to prepare a site just north of Elm Grove for a new subdivision by Perry Homes.  I visited the area shortly after both floods and concluded that was likely the case (see post here).

After about a year of haggling and litigation, the City and Harris County have reached a deal with Perry Homes to purchase the property for $14 million.  After the purchase it will be used for flood detention and green space.  Despite the hefty price tag, this is absolutely the right thing to do and City Council and the  Commissioners’ Court should approve the sale.

Kudos for getting this done go to Kingwood flood watchdog, Bob Rehak, and Elm Grove Civic Club president, Beth Guide.  Both have tirelessly advocated for the Elm Grove flood victims.  I do not think this would have happened had they not kept this issue in front of the elected officials.

Some have criticized the proposed deal as a bailout of Perry Homes, whose principals are generous campaign donors, of a project that should never have been built.  According to this Houston Chronicle story, City flood czar, Steven Costello, the City and County are only paying Perry Homes its cost of the property.  However, I find that claim somewhat incredulous considering that the current value on the Montgomery County tax rolls is under $2 million.

Nonetheless, this is still the right thing to do because even at this price, the long-term benefit to the area affected will far outweigh the cost.  This $14 million will provide protection for over $100 million in homes.

However, the Elm Grove travail should be a guide for how we handle flood issues in the future.  For far too long, our relatively lax flood rules have allowed development to be shoe-horned into areas like this where the collateral flood problems they would cause were predictable.

The knee-jerk reaction to this problem is to pass onerous new rules restricting development, as the City and County have done with their 2-feet over the 500-year flood plain requirement.  While certainly some tightening of the rules was overdue, strict rules like the 2-feet/500-year rule place a heavy burden on property owners for what has fundamentally been a failure of government policy.  Such rules also disproportionately affect lower income neighborhoods where flooding is more common, and the residents have less financial ability to comply.  However, landowners with more resources generally find a way to skirt the rules.

A better course would be to combine better restrictions (but less onerous than the 2-feet/500-year rule) with aggressive and proactive property purchases.  When I was studying the flooding problems during the last campaign I saw, literally, hundreds of properties that were candidates to be purchased and permanently dedicated as green space for both recreation and flood control.  In the final analysis more balanced approach would reduce flooding, provide park space and enhance property values and, therefore, the tax base – without destroying neighborhoods.

Winston Churchill has been credited for saying that “Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing…after they have exhausted all other possibilities.”1  That is about the way I feel about this deal.  If the City and County had been out proactively buying properties for flood control, this one could have most likely been bought for a fraction of the proposed price . . . and hundreds of families would have most likely been spared being flooded . . . twice.

_____________________________________________________________

Note 1 – There is some dispute about whether Churchill is actually responsible for this quote.  – See Quote Investigator

ShareTweet

Bill King

Related Posts

Eight of Ten Largest U.S. Cities, Including Houston, Lost Population in 2021
City Of Houston Finances

Eight of Ten Largest U.S. Cities, Including Houston, Lost Population in 2021

June 4, 2022
“The lady doth protest too much, methinks”
Ethics

“The lady doth protest too much, methinks”

May 23, 2022
Harris County Commissioners to Consider $40,000 per Month for No-Bid Contract for “Executive Protection Services”
Crime

Harris County Commissioners to Consider $40,000 per Month for No-Bid Contract for “Executive Protection Services”

April 25, 2022
Ethics

County Paid $885,000 on the Vaccine Contract after Hidalgo Decided to Cancel It

April 18, 2022
Harris County SAM Party Urges the Bail Bond Boardto Adopt a Minimum Fee for Violent Crimes
Crime

Harris County SAM Party Urges the Bail Bond Boardto Adopt a Minimum Fee for Violent Crimes

April 7, 2022
Unpacking the Texas Mail-In Voting Screw-Up
Election Reform

Unpacking the Texas Mail-In Voting Screw-Up

March 23, 2022
Load More
Next Post
If You Have Symptoms, Stay Home

If You Have Symptoms, Stay Home

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By Categories

  • Book Review
  • City Of Houston Finances
  • Climate Change
  • COVID-19
  • Crime
  • Demographics
  • Economics
  • Election Reform
  • Environment
  • Ethics
  • Faith
  • Federal Government Finances
  • Flooding
  • Gun Violence
  • Harris County
  • Harvey Recovery
  • homeblog
  • Human Trafficking
  • Hurricane Preparation
  • Ike Dike
  • Immigration
  • Kingwood
  • Management Districts
  • Media
  • Mobility
  • Montrose Management District
  • National Economy
  • National Economy
  • National Politics
  • Pensions
  • Police Polices & Procedures
  • Police Policies & Procedures
  • Political Parties
  • Property Taxes
  • Public Health
  • Quote of the Week
  • Race
  • Rebuild Houston
  • Rebuild Houston – Drainage Fee
  • SAM Party
  • Social Security
  • State of Texas
  • State of Texas Finances
  • TIRZ
  • Uncategorized
  • Uptown
  • Utility Grid
Bill King Blog

Posts range from local to national issues and focus on fact-based analysis, avoiding hyperbole and partisanship. The site is intended to be an open, respectful discussion of the critical issues of our day. Contact Bill directly and let him know what matters to you - weking@weking.net

Recent News

  • Suicide in America
  • Gun Deaths in America by the Numbers

Our Social Media

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Bill
  • Policy Discussion
  • Categories
  • Tune in