Friday, May 27, 2022
Bill King Blog
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Bill
  • Policy Discussion
  • Categories
  • Tune in
  • Home
  • About Bill
  • Policy Discussion
  • Categories
  • Tune in
No Result
View All Result
Bill King Blog
No Result
View All Result
Home City Of Houston Finances

We are Re-Voting on Rebuild Houston to “Affirm What Already Is” . . . or Not

by Bill King
August 17, 2018
in City Of Houston Finances, Flooding, Rebuild Houston, Rebuild Houston - Drainage Fee
1
Quote of the Week – Will Rogers on the Democratic Party
Share this article
  

City Council voted yesterday to hold another vote on the Rebuild Houston proposition in November. You may recall that the Texas Supreme Court invalidated the original election held in 2010 because the City used misleading ballot language. But apparently your vote does not really matter, because Turner has said that regardless of the outcome of the election the City will continue run the program the way it has been.

Rebuild Houston was primarily the brain child of the engineering community and arose from their frustration that the City had for decades been under-investing in its infrastructure. They had the idea of establishing a new revenue source, the drainage fee, and then creating safeguards to ensure the new money would go to infrastructure and not disappear down the black hole of profligate City spending. A noble idea to be sure. But the engineers grossly underestimated the ability of City officials to find loopholes in their “lockbox” and their willingness to just blatantly ignore the charter amendment language.

The most striking example of the City’s disregard of the charter amendment’s safeguards is the limitation on spending on “maintenance and operations.” The amendment specifically provides, “no more than 25% of each annual appropriation to the Fund may be used for maintenance and operation expenses.” Here is the budget for the Rebuild fund that was just adopted by Council a few months ago.

Now I am sure that even the mathematically challenged will recognize that $88.5 million and $97.4 million are significantly more than 25% of $209.5 million and $222.5 million, respectively. In fact, every year that Rebuild Houston has been in existence the City, according to its own budget numbers, has exceeded the 25% voter-mandated limitation.*  And trendline for M&O expenditures, both on a percentage basis and in absolute dollars, has been increasing.

In the first year after Rebuild was adopted, the City moved about 500 employees from being paid by the Public Works Department to being paid by the Rebuild fund. By my count, about half of these were sitting at desks at City Hall. To give you some idea how far afield the program has run, the City posted a position this year for a “pedestrian and bike coordinator” to be paid from Rebuild. [Click [here] for job posting.]

You may recall this commercial from the Rebuild campaign in 2011 promising that “the best part is the politicians can’t divert a single cent.”

 

Well, actually the City’s books show that about 56 cents of every drainage dollar has been diverted to something other than drainage. And that is based on a very generous definition of drainage to include any street, driveway, curb and sidewalk constructed at the same time drainage work is done. My best guess is that about 20% of the drainage fees have actually been spent on drainage. It makes you wonder how many people’s houses might have been saved from flooding during Harvey if the City had actually spent the drainage fees on drainage.

Of course, the whole point to the Rebuild program was to increase infrastructure spending. In that quest it has been an abject failure. Infrastructure spending has actually declined for the last three years.

Turner said in announcing the do-over vote that it was “just to reaffirm what already is.” Well, I don’t know about you, but I am not too crazy about “what already is.” So, I plan to vote against Rebuild. Hopefully we can come up with a real lockbox in the future instead, or perhaps some elected officials that will not pilfer the drainage fees to balance the City’s budget and to fund their pet projects. I know, I know . . . . but I can dream, can’t I?  As recall someone said, if you can dream you can do it.

 

*The City justifies spending more than 25% on M&O by claiming that some of the expenditures they call M&O in the budget have a life of more than one year and reclassifying those in the audit as “capital outlays.”  Magically, the amount they reclassify each year just happens to reduce M&O expenditures to just below the 25% limit.  But I am sure that is just a coincidence.

 

ShareTweet

Bill King

Related Posts

City’s 2021 Pension Reports
City Of Houston Finances

City’s 2021 Pension Reports

January 3, 2022
The Cost of Nationalizing Local Elections
City Of Houston Finances

The Cost of Nationalizing Local Elections

September 24, 2021
Quote of the Week – “Never Waste a Good Crisis”
City Of Houston Finances

Quote of the Week – “Never Waste a Good Crisis”

June 30, 2021
“Highlights” from the City’s Audit
City Of Houston Finances

“Highlights” from the City’s Audit

January 13, 2021
City and County Should Approve Purchase of Land to Protect Elm Grove
City Of Houston Finances

City and County Should Approve Purchase of Land to Protect Elm Grove

December 8, 2020
Update on City of Houston Finances
City Of Houston Finances

Update on City of Houston Finances

November 19, 2020
Load More
Next Post
Quote of the Week – Will Rogers on the Democratic Party

Don’t Leave Anything Visible in Your Car!

Comments 1

  1. Stephen Watson says:
    4 years ago

    Lying corrupt politicians. I say vote no on every bond issue or tax increase no matter what.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By Categories

  • Book Review
  • City Of Houston Finances
  • Climate Change
  • COVID-19
  • Crime
  • Demographics
  • Economics
  • Election Reform
  • Environment
  • Ethics
  • Faith
  • Federal Government Finances
  • Flooding
  • Harris County
  • Harvey Recovery
  • homeblog
  • Human Trafficking
  • Hurricane Preparation
  • Ike Dike
  • Immigration
  • Kingwood
  • Management Districts
  • Media
  • Mobility
  • Montrose Management District
  • National Economy
  • National Economy
  • National Politics
  • Pensions
  • Police Polices & Procedures
  • Police Policies & Procedures
  • Political Parties
  • Property Taxes
  • Public Health
  • Quote of the Week
  • Race
  • Rebuild Houston
  • Rebuild Houston – Drainage Fee
  • SAM Party
  • Social Security
  • State of Texas
  • State of Texas Finances
  • TIRZ
  • Uncategorized
  • Uptown
  • Utility Grid
Bill King Blog

Posts range from local to national issues and focus on fact-based analysis, avoiding hyperbole and partisanship. The site is intended to be an open, respectful discussion of the critical issues of our day. Contact Bill directly and let him know what matters to you - weking@weking.net

Recent News

  • “The lady doth protest too much, methinks”
  • Poll:  58% of Voters Would Consider Moderate Independent in 2024 And Utah Democrats Make a Surprise Move

Our Social Media

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Bill
  • Policy Discussion
  • Categories
  • Tune in